jurishub
Built for GIMPA Faculty of Law

Past questions, organised by topic — not just by year.

JurisHub turns years of scattered past papers into a structured, searchable study system. Pick a topic and see every related question that has ever been asked.

Create your free account I already have an account
11 courses1082 past questions12 exam years covered

You know the old way. Here's the difference.

The old way

  • Hunt through 10+ scanned PDFs per course, one exam year at a time
  • Print or photocopy papers just to have something to revise from
  • Search one file at a time — no way to search a whole course at once
  • No idea which topics you've actually covered before the exam

With JurisHub

  • One topic view shows every year a question on it was ever asked
  • Everything lives on your phone or laptop — nothing to print or carry
  • Search across an entire course's past questions in one go
  • See exactly how much of each course you've reviewed

Pick a course, then a topic

Contract Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law — drill down to the exact topic you're revising, like Offer or Consideration.

See every past question at once

Every question ever tagged with that topic, from every exam year, in one list. No more flipping through PDFs year by year.

Save and practise

Bookmark questions for later, or start a focused practice session on just the topic you need to master.

A real look inside — Public International Law

Actual past questions already tagged and searchable in JurisHub.

2021End of First Semester Exam

Consent to be bound is the root of all treaties either multilateral or bilateral. Discuss the various means by which a state can express consent to be bound in a treaty making process and the grounds under which consent to be bound expression could be invalidated. Support your answer with international law cases and legal instruments.

Formation, Capacity and Consent to be BoundInvalidity of Treaties (Duress, Coercion)
2021End of First Semester Exam

Three states, Corea, Neathanderl and Moorim, are found at the southern part of the continent. The three states have been faced with the consistent killing of women over the years. They all suspected the Qashano group, a notorious group rumored to be formed by the indigenous people, to be behind the killing of the females. Distraught, the heads of the three states convened on 4th April 2009 at Kulin, the capital of Corea, to discuss a way by which they could capture this group. During the deliberations, Corea suggested that they recognize 'femicide' as a crime. This Femicide Convention, inter alia, posits that the states party to it can try any persons or groups that purposely target and kill women. Despite the passage of this convention, the President of Moorim is calm. He knows very well that the provisions are not applicable in his state as it is a dualist state whereas the other states are monist states. Years passed with the Qashano group still killing the women with no sign of them being caught. Nevertheless, the three states undertook investigations and always tried members of the group that they caught. It is 2020; the leader of the Qashano group, Vincenzo Gon, has been captured by the officials of Moorim. Gon alleges that Pampanaa, president of Moorim, is one of the main aiders and abettors to the continuous killing of women in the three states. As the Attorney General of Moorim, discuss and conclude on the following issue (Kindly note that the state of Moorim has the same legal system as Ghana): Whether or not Moorim can try Vincenzo Gon.

Monism and DualismBases of Jurisdiction (Territorial, Nationality, Passive Personality, Protective)
2021End of First Semester Exam

[Continuing the Corea/Neathanderl/Moorim/Qashano femicide scenario above] Whether or not there exists a customary international law rule on the prohibition of the killing of women.

Customary International Law: State Practice and Opinio Juris
Sign up to save and practise questions like these

Frequently asked questions